FDA and CluePoints agreement boosting clinical data quality

FDA and its stakeholders have a vested interest in ensuring the integrity of clinical trial data and the safety of participants while clinical research is being conducted.

People taking part in clinical trials can be put at significant risk of harm if clinical research misconduct such as fabrication or omission of data in reporting study results. Additionally, fraud and other forms of misconduct impairs FDA’s goal to safeguard and promote public health by jeopardizing the accuracy of data provided to the agency.

To discover signals of suspected misbehavior, the FDA and other authorities have to rely on site inspections and whistleblowers. Yet due to the large number of product filings, the FDA can only inspect a small percentage of clinical trial sites.

The determination of which sites to inspect can involve FDA inspectors’ judgement and experiences, suggestions by clinical and statistical reviewers, and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)’s risk-based site selection tool. Under the original Contract Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) between FDA and CluePoints​, software was developed, and CluePoints’ existing software was enhanced to produce a ranked list of anomalous sites to help prioritize site inspection(s) for FDA inspectors.

As a result of the original CRADA, the CluePoints​ software was deployed in the FDA high performance computing environment, new statistical tests were developed to detect anomalous sites, the site ranking algorithm was improved, as well as the user interface for use by reviewers and others at FDA was also improved. Additionally, significant progress was made in the detection of modulators of treatment effect, i.e., factors such as center, region, or country that have a statistically significant impact on the magnitude of treatment effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *